Wednesday, February 14, 2007

What's so hard about the academic essay?

From reading chapter 2 of Engaging Ideas, I found it helpful that Bean identifies the reasons that students struggle so much to write the academic essay. For some, the misconception of how one writes a paper or why one writes a paper might cause problems. For others, the underdeveloped ability to think abstractly or to consider another person’s perspective—limiting their ability to write for an audience—might cause problems. I think it is relatively easy to correct students’ misconceptions about writing—the instructor can simply explain the goals of the assignment and describe the writing process. It is much more difficult to get some students to master complicated skills. I appreciate Bean’s list of what instructors can do to help their students think abstractly and consider their audience. Instructors can present writing as a process. I never fully considered the benefit of teaching a process model of writing before. From my tutoring experience in the writing lab, I get the sense that students aren’t accustomed to revising their papers. Most students I talk with seem to think that there is writing and editing with little work in between. So it’s no wonder that they find analytical writing so difficult—most scholars cannot write a successful analytical essay in one draft. Nor can students fully develop their ideas and adequately consider their audience and meet the other criteria of a well written essay in one draft. The best way for students to improve their ability to think on a deeper level is practice and, thankfully, the process model of writing provides that.

3 comments:

Joe Chevalier said...

Exactly! Process is the key. That's one reason I'm glad we're doing these papers- I can have, for one assignment at least, a series of drafts to present them as examples of revision (I've lost most of my undergraduate drafts- doh!). As you say, Andrew, they aren't accustomed to revising so much as editing, and without models it will be difficult for them to conceive of what real revision should look like.

Rebecca said...

Revising is the essential element. Students are too used to proofreading for grammatical errors because they have never been taught how to address the "higher order concerns" (sorry--SSC language) and so feel at a loss as to how to revise such concerns. I think it is important to consider the whole process because high schools across the country seem to be very misguided in this fact, which is unfortunate

Court said...

I agree with everything said here--and Bean really puts it together nicely. One revision strategy that I stumbled onto that has worked very well for me at SSC is asking writers to consider doing an outline--I mean after they've written their first, second, even "final" drafts. They go back and outline what they've already written--it forces them to ask, "What's my thesis?" and "What is the topic sentence of this paragraph?" "How does this next sentence relate logically back to the topic sentence and the thesis?" and so on.

I have a few "repeat customers" and they all use it now. I sometimes use an analogy to describe it--doing a dissection of a body (I first ask it they're _Grey's Anatomy_ fans, and a couple are and that helped). The outline is the skeleton, the frame of the paper, and the thesis is the heart--it keeps everything going, the actual words of the whole paper are the flesh and blood, all circulating back to thesis. It sounds cheesy here, but it's worked really well.